Requests for Votes Thread

At this moment they have a different cover art.
They should not be merged in this state.


I have a problem that really sucks. There are some people on musicbrainz that dont like me and they make sure to vote no on everything and they also remove everything i add and make it impossible to do anything. i have wasted a lot of time adding the artist and releases a few times before finally realizing there is no way for me to stop them. so now i have added the artist and just one release and Iā€™m hoping that some people here will subscribe to me and vote yes when i add stuff. I will return the favor any way I can. I also donā€™t understand how to vote. i have made over 10 auto edits and have had the account for 15 days so am i supposed to be able to vote now? I was not able to.

ā€¦that is the release and an album cover was added and the voting is open on that. This time I used an alt account to add everything so maybe that will help me avoid the bullies. Thanks to anyone who reads all of this and tries to help.

These two release groups are exactly the same and need to be merged

1 Like

Updated track title and length of track

Please explain what makes you trust that Discogs listing (without scans) more than the original edit. :slight_smile:


Look under ā€œ3 May, 1986: Cal Expo Amphitheater, Sacramento, CAā€ which also backs it up.

This also backs up the trackā€¦


3 posts were split to a new topic: Mariama / Frida Mariama Touray

11 posts were split to a new topic: Nirvanaā€™s Nevermind album - 12 vs. 13 tracks

9 posts were split to a new topic: Can a playlist be considered a release?

Can I please ask for votes on this edit:

I attached a DiscID on a wrong disc (out of 14), and Iā€™m not sure what problems could occurs if the same ID is used for different discs (of the same release) when ripping or tagging.

I need some eyes on this edit.
TL;DR a major publisher changed its name and some other info, and this editor is trying to hijack an old iteration by a similar name for it. This goes against years of precedent.

I need this edit quickly approved so a track doesnā€™t get messed up by an album merge.


Iā€™d like some opinion on my proposed edit.

Edit #82371383


Please discuss in below thread (not here) and conclude in the edit notes:

I would like to notify editors from the edit history, by order of appearance:

  1. @DigitalLove
  2. @chiark
  3. @jswagner
  4. @sbontrager
  5. @Kid_Devine
  6. @accridEYE
  7. @ibitsu
  8. @Cryoclaste
  9. @chaban
  10. @finalsummer

Iā€™d like some input in this merge

As provided in the edit note, they share identical wikidata item, and after a quick google search the apparent misspelling is from a TBS producer rather than the composer linked.

1 Like

In this release/release group

the artist information is wrong and the correct one is the following

as per publisher catalog

How to proceed: changing artist and merging or deleting?

1 Like

In almost all cases you should merge rather than delete.

Arguably this could be credited to Batagraf/Jon Balke; both names appear on the front cover and in the ECM listing. However, the discogs listing has full cover art which shows that the back cover, spine, and the disc itself only credit Batagraf , so personally I would leave it at that.


Accidentally double made an event, by ā€œresubmitting formā€ :sweat_smile:

4 posts were split to a new topic: Error with Hue & Cry on 101 80s Anthems

Can anyone here quickly review/approve my edit? Itā€™s just a small edit