I voted no on this, but would like more input about temporary artwork changes (now reverted back to original) to digital releases since it’s an unusual case.
@tigerman325 just did a batch of Edits on Pink Floyd for something similar. A week long sales campaign. (I am just tagging his name here so he sees this… I stuck my other comments in the thread)
I’ll need https://musicbrainz.org/edit/134576634 to go through so that I can merge the recordings with the original page:
https://musicbrainz.org/release/85a7edc2-d8dd-487d-9023-0617228ffc8e
@TheFanCon - The edits of a track list would not disrupt a recording merge. You can still line up recording merges and all would be fine. It is the recordings that merge.
Oh, right, I forgot…
I filed a bunch of edits to clean up duplication between Venezuelan and Puerto Rican Nelson González. It’d be great if we could get the clean up edits on this instance through: Open Edits for Nelson González - MusicBrainz
After, I want to merge to Nelson González - MusicBrainz, but don’t want to drag the wrong relationships there. (Feel free to file that merge yourself.)
(The Venezuelan Nelson González we’ll keep is this one https://musicbrainz.org/artist/a9df2e0d-c17b-4e26-a6fd-40e2ea83654e.)
I’m removing 33 fake releases, many-CD format from bit torrent.
These are making us waste so many time fixing typos and reviewing unverifiable recording merges.
I would appreciate some votes on this merge, so additional work can be done soon.
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/134964741
The incomplete release needs a lot of work, which I outlined in the edit note.
The original editor (a beginner, based on their number of edits) who added the incomplete release added the barcode that matches the 2-disc release, and the artwork that was added later, so I’m fairly sure what I’m doing is the simplest path.
2 posts were merged into an existing topic: Are digital torrent/blog bootleg compilations releases? (asking again)
I’m nervous about my ongoing 33 release removal, about to apply in 20 hours.
More yes/no eyes still welcome.
There are more than double Yes votes than No votes. But still, 7 No votes is a lot.
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/135299848
classical style vs soundtrack, honestly unsure about this but it doesn’t seem wrong to me.
https://musicbrainz.org/artist/eec466a4-aec6-42ea-ab35-20416e502b9d/open_edits
Difference in opinion with another editor about common capitalization variations as artist intent, would like people to weigh in as right now it’s on 0 yes/1 no for both our edits as we’re the only no votes on them.
Edit: Looks like someone (seems mistakenly) voted down both sets of edits. Here’s a filtered version that has mine and the other editors.
My edits changing The → the (English guideline based argument):
Other editors edits changing the → The (artist intent based on semi-consistency argument, I dispute it being artist intent):
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/135625657
I need this to go through before I can do a bunch of other stuff. Thanks in advance
Wouldn’t mind some more attention on Edit #135460237 - MusicBrainz , concerning Worldwide for a physical release. Don’t really know what the approach usually is here (for big-selling artists on multinational labels), so entirely possible that the edit is not correct. (More) comments that would help me make good decisions going forward also appreciated of course. ![]()
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/135868686
need help removing a release that does not exist
Is my advice to this editor correct? It seems like the simplest way to correct the situation:
EDIT - merge cancelled! See @jesus2099 ‘s note! (Thanks to him)
Hello, I would appreciate a vote on this edit, please:
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/136575356
Merging two different releases (in different release groups)
Also - does my merge look correct?
Basically, one version is listed under albums and another was listed under compilations. I think the first one added was credited to the wrong recording artist, hence the confusion…
Thanks.
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/136658200 A user wants to change the title for ethical reasons, but I don’t think that’s a valid reason. One shouldn’t get into an ethical discussion in these cases.
