Requests for Votes Thread

MusicBrainz
, , ,
1844

Yes, I guess I could have worded that bit better, especially given I wrote both bits at the same time :sweat_smile:. My point was: “if someone else has made some edit you think is a problem and want other people’s eyes on it quickly, posting it here is fine, if you want support with your own editing, just make a thread, ideally maybe before you make the edits if you’re unsure” :slight_smile:

9 Likes
1845

New recordings for two live releases that reused studio recordings: Open Edits for Gloson - MusicBrainz see e.g. Recording “The End/Aftermath” by Gloson - MusicBrainz (not sure why these need a vote, iirc I replaced recordings before without it.)

1846

Why do you need quick votes, specifically?
Because you intend to link all works afterwards, for example?
I let you add your motivation in your original post and I’ll remove my post, here. :wink:

In this topic, please explain why you want us clicking your bunch of links, how it helps.

There is a grace period of thirty to sixty minutes after adding a release, within which your additional edits will be automatically applied.
I guess it was your case.

3 Likes
1847

I think it is more like 24 hours…

2 Likes
1848

Morning all

Can I have 3 times yes please on this edit?

Edit #132013439 - Merge artists

Thank you all

1849

It seems that I need to mute this topic.

3 Likes
1850

I don’t know whether I should post this here, or it should be split off as a new topic. This editor/artist is arguing that placeholders she used as labels on DSPs are not labels. I don’t want to remove the information she created, and she seemingly doesn’t want it implied that she has a label, so what should I do here? I could use artist credits for the copyright holder half, but that doesn’t account for the release labels, for which we do not have alternate credits.

1 Like
1851

Hello!

Could I have some eyes on the following 3 edits of mine:

Someone voted No on these edits where I’m setting the Data Quality to High, however I failed to reach them, trying to understand what other information is available that hasn’t been entered.

Thank you in advance!

1 Like
1852

You link isn’t bringing any edits up.

2 Likes
1853

Most of the discussion is contained in this edit.

2 Likes
1854

An editor and I (as “No” voter in this case) would appreciate other views on Edit #131874745 (and related Edit #131874746). Cheers!

1 Like
1855

I’m not sure what to do with the Edit #132103159. I would appreciate other editors’ votes and opinions on this case.

1 Like
1856

https://musicbrainz.org/release/b1aac8ae-ab09-4f4f-9c2e-2a2ff90c3e12/open_edits

Going to need the edits on this page to go through primarily because it is a duplicate of the following page and needs to be merged into it:
https://musicbrainz.org/release/eb7ac20f-bcbc-4674-817a-f169fb7252ec

1857

Edit #132639190 - MusicBrainz - merge label “NoCut Music” into “NoCut”

“NoCut Music” seems to be the way that streaming sites refer to them, while their website says “NoCut Entertainment” and “NoCut Publishing”. Just making sure I’m not missing anything, as far as I can see it’s all the same.

1858

I am fixing the disc metadata for Aldebaran by NSB and the original medium (without discs) needs to be deleted because of duplicates. This requires a vote, apparently? Anyway:

https://musicbrainz.org/edit/132900912

1859

How do we feel about AI image upscaling:
https://beta.musicbrainz.org/edit/132922891

2 Likes
1860

Crediting label/publisher as artist, as on streaming service/s? Input needed:

https://beta.musicbrainz.org/edit/133054747

1861

Did some cleanups on this new release and also added the Korean digital release:

https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/6e2c3dbb-7661-4ac0-b623-086b09e23062/open_edits

On my addition, I lowercased the (trio), (arrange) and (piano solo) parts since those should be ETI. Is my understanding correct there? If so, I’d also update the international release and the recordings.

1 Like
1863

https://beta.musicbrainz.org/release/cf01eee1-f937-49a7-8387-8cda3863f25f

1 Like
1864

Hi, all. A typo (source: various streaming platforms and the label’s own website listing) in a track title has proliferated across multiple releases and the associated work.

The correct title is ‘Room 117’, not 177. Refer to:

Please vote on these edits so that the correct data is served soon:

Many thanks!

Edit: thank you all for the quick voting. Can confirm that Picard now pulls down the correct details for all releases in the group.