People are demoting ETI to mere disambiguations. This seems not in spirit of current guidelines:
Related discussions where one of the voters seems to have made this a habit and entered many such edits in the past already:
I’d appreciate some votes on this edit since it doesn’t seem correct to me, but my knowledge on labels is limited, so I don’t have a strong opinion:
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/112500045
https://musicbrainz.org/release/ea66bed4-e490-4446-8868-3201bff35dab
This 1960 release of Catalogue d’oiseaux, performed by the 2nd wife of Messiaen, Yvonne Loriod, was in the same release group, and coupled to the same recordings, as the 1971 release / 1970 recording on Erato, also performed by Yvonne Loriod.
I edited the 1960 release (and corrected capitalisation) to a new release group, and to refer to new recordings. (I think it’s recorded 1959, but not sure, didn’t yet find a reference.)
But it’s risky, hard or impossible to couple the new recordings to proper works before the edit is applied.
Some votes would be appreciated.
As well as any comments in case I would have made an error somewhere.
1 Like
Analog vs digital mix recordings: can someone let me know if these recording merges I’m doing are correct or not? Thanks.
https://musicbrainz.org/search/edits?auto_edit_filter=&order=desc&negation=0&combinator=and&conditions.0.field=release&conditions.0.operator=%3D&conditions.0.name=Poltergeist+II%3A+The+Other+Side&conditions.0.args.0=2012702&conditions.1.field=status&conditions.1.operator=%3D&conditions.1.args=1&conditions.2.field=type&conditions.2.operator=%3D&conditions.2.args=74
…but if these are digital vs analog mixes they should be separate recordings by definition, even if they are quite similar.
1 Like
I don’t think this “argument” is gonna go anywhere:
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/112720236
Simple enough release group merge of the same single.
1 Like
Edit #112832267 - MusicBrainz / Edit #112831979 - MusicBrainz
I have just a few typo corrections to look over here.
I am asking community to check/vote on this 2 edits:
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/112966164
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/112966141
Its my edits based on this one:
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/110208269
This artist/label has a long history of “how it should be credited” and new editors often try to change this. I am asking to make some community-based decision and finish with this.
My previous similar edits for these RG had no objections as it seems:
https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/5e79ace0-c2ea-4fc0-b30e-ac7f69e77dea
https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/d8cb3b25-0626-4f47-bcfa-8440291462ba
https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/879ec187-58ee-4b90-9b6c-f23d81d65a58
https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/a1268879-58c9-449e-9a00-a1f84ddb9658
https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/420aa2a5-a0ec-4180-a43f-59bfd0ec6def
Ideally all discography should be corrected in this way.
Unless something changed, a subtitle should have a colon not a dash. Humanity: Chapter 1
Is it a subtitle or could it be considered under series rules? Ex: Humanity, Chapter 1. I personally like subtitle better. But always wondered if Chapters were series or not.
It looks like this release group will be merged with another that has identical content. I had originally attached a TOC as votable, in an abundance of caution, because the timings were so different from what we were carrying (the times on my disc don’t match what Discogs show as being in the booklet, which appear to be where we got the times). But edits are stacked up behind it now. Please have a look and let me know of anything amiss. Release group first, then edits.
https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/5b8ec11a-d311-4ee9-822f-4974dca474f9
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/113155200
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/113222615
and also, the following will look suspect by time difference, but match on fingerprint and on ‘these must be the same release group’:
2 Likes
Another editor doing the same right now → Editor “Gandrushka” - MusicBrainz
In this topic, please link some edit(s) with some context about why you link it here.
I don’t understand why you link an editor, and without information. 
2 Likes
The context is in the post I’m replying to, you can click on chaban’s name to see it.
2 Likes
Label experts - input wanted!
Edit discussion with @David_Osipov about merging labels/rights holders/imprints(?):
https://beta.musicbrainz.org/edit/113361744
1 Like
Edit #113414400 - MusicBrainz - Another “Kenji Yamamoto” Mix-up
Edit #113255998 - MusicBrainz - Applying a fix already approved on the first release
Edit #113416466 - MusicBrainz / Edit #113461185 - MusicBrainz - Artist name mix-up
1 Like
Just to be sure. Am I right to merge these artists?
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/113502558
1 Like
Can someone more experienced than me share their opinion on this add medium edit? Thanks
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/113471709
1 Like
hi, would it be possible to help me? i try to fix/split 1 artist into 2 because they are not the same, proofs are in the edit notes, if more is needed just let me know. Thanks 
https://musicbrainz.org/artist/682279fb-e736-4e43-8e91-bafd83d7d2f1/open_edits
1 Like
Edit going to merge digital and vinyl releases into a CD release.
Maybe they wanted to merge the release groups instead?
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/113546010
2 Likes