8 posts were split to a new topic: Problems with (manual) sorting in Series
Please vote for a mini-consensus: Should multi-channel description like “(5.1 mix)” be included in track info?
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/73703622
1 Like
This artist was entered twice with fairly thorough release histories, one from bandcamp and one from discogs, apparently about the same time. I have merged artists, rgs, releases, and recordings (targeting the artist name as shown on bandcamp, which also has a few more releases attached):
https://beta.musicbrainz.org/artist/7a001c73-9b38-413b-947d-13fd25b2461a/open_edits
1 Like
Could I get some votes to approve https://musicbrainz.org/edit/74063176
The original download had chapter 14 missing.
The author has provided a new zip file containing this chapter.
Let’s disentangle some artists! Versatile Four gets mixed up quite a bit with The Versatile Four.
2 Likes
The releases in these two groups should be merged together. They’re from Blu-ray releases and one group has an extra track for the credits chapter of the video but one does not. The extra track should be added to the one without the credits chapter and then they should be merged.
“Linked Horizon” should be kept as the artist instead of “Revo”. It looks like one was a direct import from VGMdb where performing artists are put in album titles instead of separately.
Hi @Toad_King,
This is a review topic, not a call for edits.
If you have an edit pending that, until it applies, is blocking further edits, you can come here to request for votes and reviews. 
Jonas Brothers recording got linked to the wrong single: https://musicbrainz.org/edit/74200077
1 Like
@jesus2099 Ah, my mistake. I misunderstood the first post in this thread.
I made two edits for adding the missing tracks that need to be approved before the merging can happen.
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/74212479
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/74212537
3 Likes
Well… 
Maybe you are right.
3 Likes
I need a few votes to separate the German and Spanish Mikels.
https://musicbrainz.org/artist/5d2c9064-ae8b-42a9-a250-6eb1517d8e33/open_edits
1 Like
I started added this year’s 30 Days of Dead, where Grateful Dead releases a song a day for the rest of the month.
I created the release with the first song, then added the second song the next day. When I went to add the third song today, it’s forcing a vote. It didn’t do that for the second song.
Could I get an approval?
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/74466489
Also, does anyone have any idea why adding a song to a medium would be an auto edit one day and a votable edit the next?
There is a grace period where all fixes to your recently added release are automatic.
2 Likes
Please review these edits and the associated topic, as I don’t really mind much about download releases myself enough to go on thinking more:
1 Like
I didn’t realize that grace period lasted so long. I’ll just add new songs every week instead of every day.
Please review https://musicbrainz.org/edit/74503044
Subsequently the track https://musicbrainz.org/track/41c55e3f-dda8-3994-a715-f2ce7d151171 needs to be fixed too.
Edit: take 2, https://musicbrainz.org/edit/74504728
2 Likes
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/74481758
Without getting into the background of the artist/editor - I am trying to merge 2 pages.
The person voted no, as you can see. Yet, at the same time, he admitted they are the same person.
2 Likes
Your edit needs more details. I agree with the “don’t get into the background of the editor” idea, but your edit notes sound a lot like that.
Reading the edit comments, it sounds like “Rodrigo Barbosy” is a singer who uses “Honicli” as a stage name, and they think it should be a different artist entry, and they are hampered by a lack of skill at musicbrainz edits and poor English skills.
If someone wants to do something legitimate on Musicbrainz, but is making mistakes doing it, I think we should be trying to help them, not fight them.
If that is not the case, a better explanation of why their goal is not legitimate is in order.
Also, consider that this (creating the second artist entry) may be one legitimate edit amidst a batch of bad edits (deleting links/information they want to hide?)
2 Likes