me again! 
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/118349969
thank you! 
I would keep incorrect ISRCs from a valid source if it is a simple error (very popular: O confused with 0). However, if the incorrect ISRC points to a different recording, it should probably be removed.
Edit #118276804 - Remove ISRC
I would like to have this confirmed, as previously a decision has been made in the other direction.
The subchannel information of my CD is confirmed by the IFPI database:
→ Red Rain
→ Here Comes the Flood
This is my take as well. But I understand some editors like to retain the misapplied ISRCs. Did you follow the discussion we had a while ago here?
2 Likes
Yes, but I didn’t look it up and couldn’t remember a result. However, I will write an annotation. 
1 Like
I went down a rabbit hole trying to sort out some disambiguations, started to separate muddled artist credits in one direction (based on which credit was used more), then realized that artist already exists under a different spelling and reversed course. It’s conceivable that they’re the same person but I don’t have anything conclusive on that. It doesn’t help that these credits are scattered across at least two artists on discogs, too, but I’m reasonably sure this much is right:
Steve Pierce is the guitarist credited here, way down at bottom right. (From this release, which was what the artist was added for.)
Steve Pearce is the bassist credited as Steve Pierce for work with Royal Philharmonic Orchestra. There are related releases where he was credited with the correct spelling.
All the corrections I’ve entered (including rollbacks of my initial attempts to go the other way) can be found under: https://beta.musicbrainz.org/artist/c41bd7f5-3162-49e4-b21e-b025acf77682/open_edits
[resolved, thanks]
1 Like
I’d like some more community input on the following edits rather than just the same 2 people going back and forth. Thanks.
Last I checked, the consensus was that a 29 minute release with no bonus content does not pass the equivalency test against a 203 minute release with no bonus content.
When to merge RGs - Soundtracks/scores of different nature for the same film/game - #3 by yindesu
Release groups.. for video games - #19 by Silver_Skree
Should a remix album be in the same release group as the original album? - #5 by reosarevok
1 Like
Is it possible to speed up these 3 edits:
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/118621856
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/118623351
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/118623888
?
@Peter69 you should give some sources in the edit note. Currently it is difficult to vote on any of those without having access to the release and knowing the artist in question
5 Likes
Can you contribute to this?
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/118712218
1 Like
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/118692603
and
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/118729262
this is obviously correct (i hope) and was just an error on my part when entering the track list originally, auto-edit would be appreciated!
edit: and this one, the same thing Edit #118638695 - MusicBrainz
hi hi🫡
should i change the status of this release to Bootleg?
plz see: Edit #118385547 - MusicBrainz
this barcode is sooo weird, seems like a bootleg copy
Entering in barcode that should have been present initially:
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/118814024
1 Like
Please see annotation for Release “Sinfonie Nr. 3 D-dur / Sinfonie Nr. 4 c-moll "Tragische Symphonie"” by Franz Schubert; Berliner Philharmoniker, Igor Markevitch - MusicBrainz
Release has misprinted track titles for Schubert 4 (probably from Beethoven 7) and there are duplicate recordings in the MB which would look funny if setting them up for merge before titles match better. (Dates for Schubert 3 are also misprinted, but of no matter here.) Thanks.
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/118840160
Edit #118840161 - MusicBrainz
Edit #118840162 - MusicBrainz
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/118840163
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/118840164
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/118847343
I accidentally attached a Disc ID to a “SACD” release. I want to separate it into a Hybrid SACD-CD Layer and Hybrid SACD-SACD Layer but I can’t until the disc ID is removed 
1 Like
do we have a problem:
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/119040554
1 Like
aww, thank u guys so much
It’s been such a long time since someone voted against my edits…
Some input on this edit please? I am kinda interested how this plays out.
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/119001101
I need some votes for this merge where different releases are actually different mediums of the same release: Edit #119075568 - MusicBrainz
I will need to clean this up further by deleting mediums 5 and 6 after this merge because I cannot specify which mediums to merge together.
1 Like
Minor but highly visible edit to Michael Jackson’s disambiguation Edit #118916042 - MusicBrainz
1 Like
These recording comments are incorrect. Once they’re cleared off, it will be easy to fix with the recording comments userscript. [Done, thanks]