Edits should be self contained.
Especially drastic changes, should include everything, for reviewing and for the record.
Forums migrate and disappear (and there was no links in the edit note), Cover Art was not mentioned and not linked, etc.
It’s just advice for the future. For the sake of edit histories that give confidence.
BTW I have just now noticed that you were fixing your own added release. I would have seen that, I would have voted yes regardless the lack of elements. It helps to say in the edit note that you are just fixing your own Edit #78558789 - Add medium.
I’m trying to clean up a large box set added by a new editor. I had to split several mediums into two (multiple double vinyl albums had originally been submitted as one medium), and while I was doing that I encountered a mile-long indecipherable error message and hit the submit button a second time, which caused two of the new mediums I created to be submitted a second time (as well as completely jumbling the mediums, which I was able to fix).
Hi, could I get some quick votes on this edit please? I had initially entered a single track based on the back cover, but the CD is indeed split in 10 tracks. Once this is applied, I can attach a Disc ID.
I’d appreciate votes on the following recording merge edits. I created new recordings for a release I’ve added before realising the relevant recordings were already in the database (with the same lengths, performers, recording venue, recording year, and associated with EMI).
Not my edits, but it would be helpful if I could get some votes on these. The release date was brought forward by a week and is now live in some countries:
i’m in the process of cleaning up/fleshing out Bit Trip Runner2 releases, hoping to switch the artist on the RG to be an artist instead of a label/game studio
I have a few merges open where I’ve switched from using artist <-> artist relationships to aliases, any feedback on if this would be greatly appreciated!
