It is a CDR with mostly MP3 files plus some videos. There is a Windows EXE file that gives some structure (chapters) when playing the files, and the files themselves are in sub folders following those chapters.
For clarity’s sake it would make sense to have the same structure in the entry here, but is that how we want it in MB? A folder is not a medium per se, but for a data folder I can imagine us using a medium per folder.
(Same as using a medium per stream on a Blu-ray disc, when an album has a stereo version and a 5.1 version on one disc.)
I also don’t think these should be handled as separate media. It is more a case of grouping several tracks under a specific heading, something that often would be useful for releases in general. This is similar to how Discogs handles this.
There is a feature request for such track listing sections:
For digital downloads I sometimes split mediumsby folder, if the intent is clearly for each folder to be a very separate set of tracks.
Unfortunately for this one I agree that it would be misleading to imply there is more than one CDR - I would leave them together. And give MBS-6680 a vote
Exactly, if there is no end then everything falls under that header and it is even more unclear than without. Even misleading / incorrect, I would say.
But it’s not always bonus tracks, is it? An album that contains 2 EPs and bonus tracks can have three headers. But on Discogs I’ve seen a lot of headers for a set of three tracks in the middle of the disc without an end to the group. Then silly track numbering is needed.
Not sure if that would be the same group of tracks as the folders on a data disc or streams on a Blu-ray though.
I think nested groups would be the most versatile solution. Medium is the top level, anything else can be used for anything.
