Stop importing wrong release dates from streaming sites

MusicBrainz
, , , , ,
21

I know that harmony internally has the info when each of the streamers started, and AFAIK the plan was to use this to filter out dates that can’t be valid. But I don’t know what the state of this is. It’s part of the roadmap at Initial Roadmap · Issue #6 · kellnerd/harmony · GitHub

1 Like
22

Oh, that’s a good idea. :slight_smile: In that case some of them might be ok because the digital edition was released to coincide with a physical reissue, and some of them are probably just whatever random date FNAC started selling something. So not seeding seems like a good idea.

1 Like
23

Much of that is probably cataloged wrong, but not all. There were websites with digital media before 2000 like Mod Archive - Wikipedia (1996 according to Wikipedia). BBSes were before my time, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there were MP3 releases on some of them in the early 1990s, and possibly mod/tracker file releases before that.

1 Like
24

Please find some examples in the MB database. This is a very small minority of audio, but so little is actually here documented on MB. It is niche, gaming, sound effects, experimental.

MP3 needed an MP3 player… and back in the 1990s we were still mainly on dialup. Downloading music was hugely time consuming. Even downloading low res images would take minutes. Earliest music I remember collecting was late 1990s stolen rips of pirated CDs.

99.999% of the releases in the MB database with pre-2000 dates are going to be incorrect data. This last week I have again being trying to explain to noobies about reissue dates on itunes, spotify, etc.

Yes, there was theoretically some small amounts of digital audio pre-2000 but not of the big name artists. I doubt you could find any of it in the digital shops like Spotify\iTunes\etc today.

3 Likes
25

I know they existed. But none of those releases exist today. So, none of the ones being imported would be before 2000.

1 Like
26

Indeed there are demoscene BBS releases, but even if some could be imported from streaming platforms, just not setting the date (as too early) would be OK.
It can always be typed manually, as when adding any release.

For info, there are 20,218 pre-2001 download releases, in MB (I just randomly chose 2000 threshold).

1 Like
27

What a mess that list is. I did notice one category in there - Broadcast. I guess that is technically “digital media” as there is no other “radio broadcast media” to choose for a 1948 radio broadcast. Maybe tweak the search to exclude Broadcast?

28

At your will, sir :winking_face_with_tongue: 18,996 pre-2001 non-broadcast download releases

Unfortunately, we cannot order search results, by dates, for instance.

29

I thank you kindly young script wizard :man_mage:… Quite a range of countries in there. Shows how much obscure stuff slips past our eyes.

2 Likes
30

Quodlibet’s search is cool, so I found 4 releases just in my own colleciton:

image
image1333×423 97.7 KB

Just because it’s niche doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter.

No idea about the big digital shops, but I wouldn’t be at all surprised if some of it made its way to Bandcamp.

3 of the 4 releases I linked to above are still available to download today, though I’m guessing on a site that none of the importers support yet.

This please. I’m fine with not automatically importing old digital media release dates, but please don’t make it hard to manually enter them.

4 Likes
31

The streaming sites aren’t the only source of poor release dates. Harmony can also pull inaccurate release dates from MB itself if there is a previous release with the same barcode.

1 Like
32

Thank you for that. I looked for artists I am familiar with in the first 10% of that list and removed dates from some.

Here are two pre-2001 digital releases from people whom I would consider big-name artists

edit: and a third Release group “tokai” by jesus2099 - MusicBrainz

33

All I will point at is 18,996 found by the @jesus2099 script. And 4 found by @dseomn and a couple more by @VBZPPlNQyJ. I’ll be generous. Call it a dozen. 12/18996 = 0.0006317%

I am not saying don’t document the rare stuff. I LOVE the rare stuff. But don’t let this distort our ability to document facts. Most of the 18996 are errors. Don’t give us a default state of adding errors. Instead give us a default state of no date and allow manual edits to add correct dates.

3 Likes
34

I agree that importers shouldn’t blindly trust dates from streaming services.

That said, I only looked at a very small and biased subset of releases, perhaps 50 releases total. That would put the rate much closer to 1-5%. Still low, but I bet there are around a thousand with correct dates.

Edit: I suspect that there are a significant number of releases in there that have correct dates, but the wrong medium type. For example, Release “Symphonies nos. 1 · 5 · 6 · 8 · 10 · 15” by Shostakovitsch; Berliner Sinfonie-Orchester, Kurt Sanderling - MusicBrainz is listed as a digital release from 1996. Looking at the edit history, the creator links to a discogs page for a “digitally remastered” CD release. Perhaps the name of the “digital” format also needs to be clarified?

3 Likes