Merging work: Edit #125206902 - MusicBrainz
Replacing incorrect artist link: Edit #125209091 - MusicBrainz | Edit #125209092 - MusicBrainz | Edit #125209122 - MusicBrainz
Moving ruby text: Open Edits for 天外魔境-自来也おぼろ変-映像的電子蓄音盤(おりじなるさうんどとらっく) - MusicBrainz
If people are feeling benevolent
Hello all - would love opinions on these edits: a user changed classification from “Album” to include Compilation + Live, when they don’t apply.
many thanks for having a look!
Splitting artist names into character and artist where applicable
Misapplied “Soundtrack” work classification
Artist correction
I’d like to request votes and perspectives on the following edit:
This edit preserves “(Live Version)” as Extra Title Information (ETI) because it is explicitly included in the official release title on streaming platforms (Spotify, Apple Music, etc.). In my view, this aligns with MusicBrainz’s purpose to reflect releases as they are, based on real-world data.
I understand there’s a convention that says if the same ETI appears on all tracks, it may be removed to avoid redundancy. However, I believe this logic introduces inconsistency:
- If the same ETI appears on some tracks, it’s retained.
- But if it appears on all, it’s discarded — despite being part of the release title.
This creates a contradiction and makes ETI handling appear subjective.
I’ve tried to engage in discussion, but unfortunately the other editor seems to dismiss my concerns and insists I simply don’t understand, rather than addressing the points directly. I’m concerned this will result in the edit being rejected without fair dialogue.
To avoid this turning into a one-sided decision based on custom rather than discussion or clear guideline, I would really appreciate more community input and votes.
Thank you.
It would be wonderful if anyone could vote for these edits:
Correcting classifications for BGM works / Open Edits for 金色のガッシュベル!! オリジナルサウンドトラック - MusicBrainz
I have made edits to correct artist confusion.
Corrections to artist credits will be made after these edits are approved.
Got a few mistakes I made when copying work codes:
Edit #126049653 - MusicBrainz | Edit #126049887 - MusicBrainz
Edit #126093164 - MusicBrainz | Edit #126093166 - MusicBrainz
Edit #126093380 - MusicBrainz | Edit #126093382 - MusicBrainz
As well as a few artist-related corrections:
Edit #126096454 - MusicBrainz | https://musicbrainz.org/edit/126096455
Hi guys and again, may i ask for some votes?
Hiya all, please have a look at this edit merging dupe releases of an album