Release title standardistation within a release group?

MusicBrainz Style
, ,
1

3 of the 4 in the in the series are captured like:

Release “Armada Music Club Classics: Hard House Vol. 4 (Extended Versions)” by Various Artists - MusicBrainz
Release “Armada Music Club Classics: Hard House Vol. 3 (Extended Versions)” by Various Artists - MusicBrainz

Release “Armada Music Club Classics: Hard House Vol. 1 (Extended Versions)” by Various Artists - MusicBrainz

but the 2nd in the series is captured like

Release “Club Classics - Hard House, Vol. 2 - Armada Music (Extended Versions)” by Various Artists - MusicBrainz i.e. missing the Armada Music prefix.

Should Vol. 2 be changed to be inline with Vols 1,3 and 4 (or the other way around),or do I have to accept the OCD trigger?

It’s frustrating when associated releases are not together sequentially in a ripped folder, it makes it look like I have gaps to purchase!

2

Armada Music is the name of the label. If it were me, I would not put the label name in the release titles, even though the way the covers are designed, it could reasonably be assumed to be part of the title.

So, IMO, all the releases should be titled Club Classics: Hard House Vol. x, and the label set as “Armada Music” (this already appears to be done).

But I don’t spend much time on digital releases, so I think you should wait for more opinions.

1 Like
3

This looks a bit like the Ministry of Sound releases. The brand name is large on the covers, but not used as part of the titles.

But I would likely clean up the inconsistent Digital release title as I believe the coverart is still king even with Digital releases.