I was wondering, wouldn’t a relationship for related, but independent works be interesting?
(comparable to “sequals”)
I just noticed there is no (established) way to add a relationship to:
&
The exact same situation exists for his Debussy’s Etudes & Images
Or would such a relationship be suited to gather under a ‘series’?
Reading the style guideline for Works-Series, it seems series are only to be used for official published catalogues.
In expansion, being able to add a relationship for for instance all “Piano sonates”, or "Symphonies’ by a specific composer (for instance Beethoven) would be interesting.
Am I right there is currently no established way to gather these in some kind of relationship?
If so, wouldn’t it be interesting to establish a way to do this?
This to me sounds like something better handled by search in some form. E.g. all symphony works would be tagged “symphony”, and then you run a query for Works by given Composer with given Tag. (Or possibly “symphony” would be a work type instead? Unsure, not dealing with classical much I just know Song…)
That’s the case for the “catalogue” type, but there’s no reason why you couldn’t add a standard work series without “catalogue” I would not use this for Symphony 1, 2, etc, but for something like “X, livre 1” it seems to make sense.
I made a series for the two books with préludes by Debussy. Can you check if I’ve done it properly? See: Préludes - MusicBrainz
Is there a place where I can post suggestions for additional work types?
In this particular instance: Preludes
Not sure what to do with the Prelude & fugues by JS Bach.
They complement each other, but technically the fugue is not a prelude.
Wiki info on prelude: Prelude (music) - Wikipedia
Some more detail on the fugue: Fugue - Wikipedia
And a page about the combination: Prelude and fugue - Wikipedia
If it’s worth adding: maybe just name it “Prelude / fugue” so it can be used for both?
And they can already be