You will be told off for going off topic… so I’ll reply in a different message in case the Off Topic Choppers come a Chopping…
Bang out an example link. It is quite possible the exact relationship you need isn’t there. Sounds to me like a new “Work” with a based on link to the previous Work. The only place to add details about how that new work was made is with an Annotation in the Work definition.
I had one last week where an Recording was a Parody of another Recording but with new words. BUT that “Parody” link is only allowed to the original Work. Which meant confusion in my relationships. My new “Recording” now only has a link to the original “Work” which makes no sense…
Not every relationship is available. So fit what you can, and then annotate lots of notes to make it clear why it is different. Can be an excuse to post some of the history of the track then.
Disaster! I know, but I can’t prove. Lyrics by Rebekka Karijord, music for the first song together with Peder Kjellsby (most probably). The second is composed by Rebekka alone.
On the cover of the first song “All songs written by us” (Rebekka and Peder)
The second appears only on iTunes Deluxe Edition with no writing credits.
With box sets I have set for all included “original release boxes” front and back too. Otherwise it would not be possible to keep at least a minimum of structure in this chaos. I don’t think I will buy box sets again.
No doubt in the background there is a magical Successful Edits counter you will get past that lets stuff like that go in quicker. I don’t think I get delays on my annotations.
I added a relationship for this now, for what it’s worth But that’s mostly for “it quotes a bit of the lyrics”, if it reuses most of them I’d still use “based on” or just “later version” if it’s the same song with extra lyrics.