I ran into this release while visiting the artist page for a different edit as it was missing some core data. My question is that the release, most specifically, is directly promoting music piracy, as it has the web site printed clearly on the cover art.
Is there a policy on this and how to handle it? I understand the no support for piracy, and know that bootlegs sort of walk on that line, but this one is different to me because you cannot hide the piracy aspect since it is printed right on the artwork. The site not only has “legit” bootlegs, but also copies of clearly pirate albums, meaning that unlike this one, those albums are available for sale from the artists / record labels. This means the cover art promotes this, and if I add a reference for it, that is a piracy reference, which I believe is advised against as well.
So if one of the admins could advise on an official direction for this, that would be great. Until then, I am refraining from edits to the release.
EDIT: Ahead of a likely question… there is no other place I can find offering this release, or a cover with no web site printed on it. I can however generate a cover art version without said link on it quite easily.