Is Kansas City Hey Hey Hey really a standalone work ?
I’m wondering if recordings should refer to it like for example Kansas City / Hey‐Hey‐Hey‐Hey!
or (in my opinion better) refer to the individuel real works like Kansas City / Hey‐Hey‐Hey
And … second question, why is there the yellow duplicate warning at Kansas City
The annotation by user RocknRollArchivist (not a forum member, sadly) says “second version”, which implies that there may be a difference in composition for the medley? If you are familiar with the song’s, perhaps this medley has a unique bridge or something like that?
Unfortunately the link in the annotation is dead as well, and no Wayback Machine archive. Probably something to ask them in the edit notes before merging/splitting.
I don’t see a yellow highlight :0
The yellow highlight (SPOT DUPLICATE RECORDINGS userscript) indicates that there are 2+ relations to the same recording and work, which is usually a mistake coming from recording merges.
When editing that work, I don’t see any duplicates
Same work-work relationships.
PS. I didn’t remember my script was also spotting duplicate work-work relationships. I thought it was only recording-work relationships.
