Something I've noticed with my edits is that, although there is the capability for things like voting, and even vetoing my additions/edits, it appears that I've never seen anyone take advantage of these features.
Is this because unlike, for example, Wikipedia (which is mostly developed and currently more about being maintained), that Musicbrainz doesn't have the adequate labour in order to audit every new addition?
It doesn't bother me too much, it's just I'm so accustomed to sites where edits are more regularly scrutinised and changed, that it surprised me how "hands off" people are regarding my edits. I'm guessing that even if I am missing or mishandling certain data, that once enough has been entered, the site will move towards "maintenance" where what has already been added can be more thoroughly scrutinised and changed.
I think I'm just not used to this level of freedom in editing databases, and I'm just voicing my discomfort. Apologies for what is likely a pointless topic, and thanks to everyone for their continued efforts cataloguing this information.