I thought it would be good to get some consensus because it seems people still have different opinions on this. Here’s a summary of the suggested rules I’ve heard so far:
By default use part of “{insert release title}” DJ-mix
If there’s multiple releases with the same name and not part of the same release group then use: part of {insert DJ name} “{insert release title}” DJ-mix
In each case you are either removing information (which goes against the point of disambiguation) or replacing typographically correct punctuation with ANSI, citing your own edits as justification. Also, the correct term in MB terminology is “DJ-mix” (with hyphen).
Thanks @rafwuk (and @jesus2099 for the comments). Based on both of your feedback it sounds like adding the actual DJ into the comment would be best. With regards to the correct punctuation/ANSI - do you mean changing the double quotes to be “ vs " ?
Behind the scenes I created a simple user script to generate the comment, so it’s easy for me to fix in that. It also (based on some other feedback) warns if the recording is used on more than release. If I get it fixed to match the expected standards then I’ll upload it and share it on the forums.
For initial comment I wouldn’t mind, it would even be correct, but it’s a pity losing something better (curly double quotes, DJ names) when they are already there.