Another month, another election. Today I’m nominating @Deleted_Editor_1440677 (MB profile)
https://musicbrainz.org/election/327
In a period of ca. 5 years they’ve entered a copious amount of edits (400k, wow).
Their dedication is truly remarkable, it seems there is not a single where they are not around (and not just MB!)
Many of the open edits are for cover art of just imported Bandcamp releases (yes, the hi-res variants. Awesome). If only those were auto-edits, it would scrape off lots of stuff from the voting queue.
While there are a few downvoted edits I’m generally not concerned about them.
There was however a short series of edits changing artist credits on Japanese releases to the romanized spelling due to most of the cover art having it that way.
Is there a consensus yet what takes priority under which circumstances? I haven’t fully figured this out myself yet, discussions seem scarce. It would probably make a good topic on its own. 
PS: Totally forgot to mention @reosarevok had asked for opinions before
My response back then was:
reosarevok: Not exactly following them but often noticed them doing simple fixes that shouldn’t require further review, like release script and language disentangling artists, replacing wiki links by wikidata, etc.
