This don’t appear to be properly covered in the guidelines, but what do you say about adding employer relationships in the track-artist relationship like on https://musicbrainz.org/recording/b7dc2e8b-74bc-49ba-b031-becdf70de0db
There the arranger is set to the alias “Konami Amusement (Sota Fujimori)” for 藤森崇多. I say that information does not belong in the artist name but some think it should be there.
If it’s credited like this in both booklet and JASRAC, why not include that text in relationship artist credits indeed.
We don’t have recording-label nor work-label credits for arrange and compose.
Hmm, but there is recording-label arrange for and work-label commissioned by…
I don’t think “arranged for” (no example!) and “commissioned by” are applicable here. Multiple artists can contribute to a Recording/Work, as is the case on this release. “Konami Amusement” is attached to a specific Artist Credit, not to a Recording/Work contributed to by a mix of Konami artists and non-Konami artists.
Even if those label relationships applied to this situation, it doesn’t achieve what the relationship credits are doing.
But this is a recording - artist relationship, not a release - artist relationship so how it’s written in the booklet should not change how we format it even if the information comes from the booklet.