I have obviously never really paid attention to the recording artist field. I thought creating the relationships for the singers only where they actually participate solved the problem of them “showing up” only at the tracks they actually perform .
What is still missing is a concise step by step guide how to enter classical musci data so it turns out in the generally accepted way. (or am I just missing it?)
Hi and many thanks for the replies. I have been so pleased to learn that others have gone before me and are clearly much more knowledgeable and achieving what I had hoped. I am still very much a beginner here.
I am not a coder and chabreyflint’s link is hard work for me but clearly this is the direction I need to go. So much reading!!!
I shall return when I have absorbed a bit more
Many thanks again.
Budge
I’d probably change it personally, but it’s not very important either way and some people might prefer keeping it. I’d keep the recording as D-flat and the work as D-flat major, I think
But I’d just use D♭ in the tracklist/recording, D-flat for the digitals looks like a bad conversion by someone not realising capitalisation is related to major/minor. It possibly means the intended title should have D♭, and the digital title is just to avoid display problems.
My first post here hopefully I dont break any hard rules.
I am currently adding tons of early music recordings to the db, mostly (for now) from the labels covered by outhere recordings. For now I am doing almost everything by hand so the metadata are good enough, but could be improved.
I tried to look around but couldnt find any userscript to import from outhere
eg https://outhere-music.com/en/albums/boesmans-bartholomee-foccroulle-mernier-early-instruments
I think it would be a nice one to have if anyone can code it. The website has a very clean structure and the infos are super accurate, down to individual performers per track (booklet+cover+description).