I have found this unofficial style guide: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Hawke/Proposal/Track_numbering
Could please someone tell me, if a valid track number also can be a roman numeral?
Example: http://musicbrainz.org/release/73e7b9bd-8713-4415-b0d0-c330083f6452
1 Like
I donât see why not. It is on the scans as Roman numerals. I wouldnât use them if they werenât though.
Itâs hardly the most unusual kind of track numbering.
1 Like
I donât see why not either.
Note: you shouldnât use the unicode roman numeral table. Its use is discouraged in the unicode spec.
2 Likes
How do you translate the Roman numeral IV (4) to the ID3tag âtrack numberâ?
The official description says:
TRCK: The âTrack number/Position in setâ frame is a numeric
string containing the order number of the audio-file on its original
recording. This may be extended with a â/â character and a numeric
string containing the total numer of tracks/elements on the original
recording. E.g. â4/9â.
Should this be 4/9 for the asked example?
And what about @mfmeulenbeltâs example with the W O R L D P E A C E !?
We have two different concepts (number and position or something like that). Position is always 1-n and is what Picard uses by default for track numbering IIRC.
1 Like