Some time ago, I added an additional, digital, release to the following release group: Release group “The Strathspey King” by James Scott Skinner - MusicBrainz
In short, this release is a compilation of recordings of the famous fiddle player, James Scott Skinner. This was originally an LP released on Topic. Some years ago, it was reissued on CD, by Robin Morton’s Temple Records.
For the CD release, the packaging say that they processed the tracks through modern Cedar equipment to reduce noise and hiss, and there were additional tracks which weren’t on the original LP.
However, there was another digital download released in 2009, which had the original LP track listing. This sounds pretty much the same albeit with slightly different noise reduction. Some tracks are noiser than the CD. Nonetheless it’s clear that both do have some degree of noise processing, as there is a track on the CD with no processing whatsoever and it is definitely noisier than both the CD and the digital release. (See tracks 21 and 22 of the CD.)
I added the Topic digital release with the same recordings, as I assumed it would be like a remaster. However, one thing that throws me off is there is a track in the CD release which is dupilcated, one with the processing and the other without it, and that’s obviously set as separate recordings, which intuitively makes sense, but of course it’s only set as a separate recording due to the original track listing rather than being indicative of the proper style.
So, my question is essentially as follows: should the digital release, given it’s possibly been through different noise reduction processing, have different recordings? Alternatively, is this process essentially the same as a remaster, and in that case should the two releases share recordings as appropriate?