I didn’t expect each to get a reply. 
It was a list to put some of the oddities together to help refine the report (or reports). I am not knocking your excellent work, just showing examples that break the pattern to help improve the report script. As you noticed, many of those have their own patterns
Maybe multiple types of smaller reports would give better focus. Smaller sub-sets would also get more eyes looking I expect.
I am no fan of automatic bots making decisions due to the error rate that gets introduced. I don’t like @aerozol’s idea of deleting all of one user’s data because of a few errors. That could only work if it can focus on a date range - that can be checked. Picking on people is the wrong focus.
Unless it is an auto bot that removes all those random Stephen King audio book random additions. 