Again?
So having listed to the comments on about previously closed thread it seems the main problem was the thread should have been split and that I repeated certain points. So I’m just to seek clarification on particular statement that I try as I might I really don’t really understand
Classical releases do not have track artists
If I have a pop/rock release by a single artist typically the artist is credited on the front and spine. Then on the back the list of tracks is listed, the artist is not lis…
and
So i was trying to get a discussion on a real issue in MusicBrainz when it was closed down. I won’t discuss the details as it seems that is not allowed but I do understand the difference between disagreeing and ignoring and the key data integrity issue I was trying to explain has been continually ignored throughout the thread and remain ignored. I believe in discussion and I always happily admit my mistakes when I get things wrong but in this case my concerns have just been ignored. If you are r…
and
Related to this is how do others know what guidelines you are following. For example the guidelines for classical releases are quite different to the vanilla Rock/Pop standards for (track/recording) artists but how do you know which guidelines the editor has used. I feel there should be at least be some flag saying this release is considered classical has been entered according to the classical guidelines as opposed to a classical release that has been added using the vanilla guidelines. Without…
… seriously, can we please not do this again? I mean, if we were actually covering new ground, not something that has already been covered (in something like a hundred posts ), maybe it’d be worthwhile. And not to mention this discussion has more or less hijacked an unrelated topic.
4 Likes