Adding start and end date attribute to relationships

[indy133]

@aabbi15

Yes I also feel the same only having one date attribute (which would indicate the release date is fine)

This was written 2 years ago about this topic:

Documentation of the publishing date range of a BB edition

Since we are getting more and more editions which are not seperare editions according to BB rules, we have to think about how to display the range of these editions. At the moment there is no other way than this: [Vollbildaufzeichnung 17.04.2022 102609] adding the variants at the end of the annotation field and, if possible adding a picture (via link) of the first and the last edition of the group of variants. This should not be confused with adding information as printed in many editions l…

This might be a better explanation for what I mean:
A BB edition is NOT the same as a book edition.

Many of the editions I added look like the example in the linked thread.

[first known] release date: 1983

Annotations:

Confirmed editions [editions that are just reprints]:
3. edition: 1983
5. edition 1986

So the publishing date for this BB edition is not just 1983

We can do it this way, but it’s far from perfect I think