# What is a digipak?

**URL:** https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274
**Category:** Style
**Tags:** cover-art
**Created:** [January 30, 2017, 7:18pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274 "2017-01-30T19:18:31Z")
**Posts on this page:** 14
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ijc](https://community.metabrainz.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/48db29/32.png) [@ijc](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/ijc)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2017, 7:18pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274/1 "2017-01-30T19:18:31Z")

</div>

Am I correct in thinking that the defining characteristic of a digipak is the glued in plastic tray (similarly a digibook has a glued in plastic tray etc)?

I’ve noticed lots of releases which are labelled as digipak but which my physical copy (where I’m pretty confident it is the same release) is actually what I would call a gatefold (that is, a cardboard thing folded into two or more parts which has slots for CDs/booklets etc but crucially not a plastic tray).

Most recently I noticed this with [Release “Older Terrors” by Esben and the Witch - MusicBrainz](https://musicbrainz.org/release/a9056b51-ee8b-4501-aefc-5a2ce2b96eb0). My copy has the matching catalogue number and it even came with a sticky label on the plastic wrapper which says “deluxe digipak edition” but there is no plastic tray, the CD goes into a slot in the folded cardboard (something like [this](http://www.duplication.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/4-panel-gatefold-28587.jpg)).

I’ve “fixed” a few of these in the past as I came across them but it seems to be so prevalent that I’m wondering if I’m just wrong about what a digipak really is, so more recently I’ve not been touching them.

Am I in the wrong (or minority) here?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SURIV](https://community.metabrainz.org/user_avatar/community.metabrainz.org/suriv/32/8796_2.png) [@SURIV](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/SURIV)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2017, 8:28pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274/2 "2017-01-30T20:28:55Z")

</div>

Yes, that’s exactly right. I would change the packaging to gatefold and leave a note in the annotation clarifying that it is the “deluxe digipak edition”, even though it is not a digipak.

[Release / Packaging - MusicBrainz](https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Release/Packaging) has the definitions and some pictures:

**Digipak**  
A folded cardboard outer, typically made of coated cardboard, with a plastic tray glued into it. [[3]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Sugarcane-Digipak.jpg)

**Gatefold Cover**  
A cardboard sleeve that folds in halves, thirds, etc. It can hold multiple records or CDs as well as booklets, posters and other memorabilia. [[6]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/be/Made-in-Heaven-CD-Gatefold.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![aerozol](https://community.metabrainz.org/user_avatar/community.metabrainz.org/aerozol/32/116_2.png) [@aerozol](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/aerozol)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2017, 8:47pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274/3 "2017-01-30T20:47:13Z")

</div>

> [@ijc](#):
>
> but there is no plastic tray

Our example here:  
[https://beta.musicbrainz.org/doc/Release/Packaging](https://beta.musicbrainz.org/doc/Release/Packaging)  
Doesn’t have a plastic tray either, it’s a sugarcane (?) digipak.

So I’m not sure we’ve decided on a concrete definition that includes the plastic tray?  
Out of interest, does you in hand copy have a ‘digipak’ logo on it anywhere?  
Personally if it looks the same as a digipak on the outside (eg still has a wide spine) I feel like it’s functionally and visually pretty much a Digipak, but that’s just an opinion, I’m no expert… The internet hasn’t really helped with a definition either.

Gatefold is always a headache, I set it often, but it really should be a secondary type (eg carboard sleeve + gatefold for vinyl)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ijc](https://community.metabrainz.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/48db29/32.png) [@ijc](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/ijc)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2017, 8:52pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274/4 "2017-01-30T20:52:29Z")

</div>

I don’t know what the 'digipak ’ logo looks like (google didn’t really help, full of band logos on digipaks) but there are no unexplained/unrecognised logos anywhere on it.

WRT secondary types in this particular case there is no cardboard sleeve for the CD, it is just loose within the slot in the main body of the gatefold.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![aerozol](https://community.metabrainz.org/user_avatar/community.metabrainz.org/aerozol/32/116_2.png) [@aerozol](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/aerozol)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2017, 9:03pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274/5 "2017-01-30T21:03:36Z")

</div>

Loose in between two pieces of cardboard? Sounds like a cardboard sleeve to me 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![outsidecontext](https://community.metabrainz.org/user_avatar/community.metabrainz.org/outsidecontext/32/90_2.png) [@outsidecontext](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/outsidecontext)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2017, 9:11pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274/6 "2017-01-30T21:11:13Z")

</div>

> [@aerozol](#):
>
> Our example here:[Log in - MusicBrainz](https://beta.musicbrainz.org/doc/Release/PackagingDoesn't) have a plastic tray either, it’s a sugarcane (?) digipak.

That looks a lot like a digipack as described. And the thing about sugarcane pretty likely means some form of [bioplastics](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioplastic), which is just a form of plastics.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![aerozol](https://community.metabrainz.org/user_avatar/community.metabrainz.org/aerozol/32/116_2.png) [@aerozol](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/aerozol)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2017, 9:14pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274/7 "2017-01-30T21:14:58Z")

</div>

We’re getting bogged down, but how is that ‘folded cardboard with a plastic tray glued into it’?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![outsidecontext](https://community.metabrainz.org/user_avatar/community.metabrainz.org/outsidecontext/32/90_2.png) [@outsidecontext](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/outsidecontext)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2017, 9:36pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274/8 "2017-01-30T21:36:52Z")

</div>

> [@aerozol](#):
>
> but how is that ‘folded cardboard with a plastic tray glued into it’?

We are talking about this image, right? [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Sugarcane-Digipak.jpg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Sugarcane-Digipak.jpg)

The picture is kinda blurry, but to me it looks like exactly what you wrote: A folded cardboard with a (bio)plastic tray glued into it 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SURIV](https://community.metabrainz.org/user_avatar/community.metabrainz.org/suriv/32/8796_2.png) [@SURIV](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/SURIV)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2017, 9:50pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274/9 "2017-01-30T21:50:54Z")

</div>

A real digipak has a plastic tray. There are knockoffs without _plastic_ trays that otherwise look like a digipak. I would also file those as digipak. Packaging that does not have a tray at all, as in @ijc’s example, cannot even remotely be considered a digipak.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![aerozol](https://community.metabrainz.org/user_avatar/community.metabrainz.org/aerozol/32/116_2.png) [@aerozol](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/aerozol)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2017, 10:03pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274/10 "2017-01-30T22:03:27Z")

</div>

> [@outsidecontext](#):
>
> The picture is kinda blurry, but to me it looks like exactly what you wrote

Fair enough, to me it looked like the part that’s holding the CD is part of the rest of the packaging, not stuck on, but I see that I might be wrong about that 😱

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ijc](https://community.metabrainz.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/48db29/32.png) [@ijc](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/ijc)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2017, 10:04pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274/11 "2017-01-30T22:04:59Z")

</div>

> [@aerozol](#):
>
> Loose in between two pieces of cardboard? Sounds like a cardboard sleeve to me

It’s one of these though [http://www.duplication.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/4-panel-gatefold-28587.jpg](http://www.duplication.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/4-panel-gatefold-28587.jpg) i.e. folded in the middle with another pocket for the booklet. Isn’t it the fold which makes it a gatefold rather than a sleeve? (In this particular I think it’s actually one bit of card which has been rolled into a tube, flattened and then folded in half, but I’m sure there are lots of ways to make the same sort of thing)

Isn’t cardboard sleeve is something more like this? [http://www.groovehouse.com/images/products/diy\_stamp\_sleeve\_1.jpg](http://www.groovehouse.com/images/products/diy_stamp_sleeve_1.jpg)

Musicbrainz’s docs link to [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2c/Packaging\_Paper\_Sleeve\_with\_CD.jpg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2c/Packaging_Paper_Sleeve_with_CD.jpg) which is even called paper in the link… Seems like several of the example images leave a lot to be desired.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![aerozol](https://community.metabrainz.org/user_avatar/community.metabrainz.org/aerozol/32/116_2.png) [@aerozol](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/aerozol)
#### Post date: [January 30, 2017, 11:13pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274/12 "2017-01-30T23:13:03Z")

</div>

[quote=“ijc, post:11, topic:203274”]  
Isn’t it the fold which makes it a gatefold rather than a sleeve?[/quote]

I guess my point is that since you can make pretty much anything fold out into three panels, I don’t really think this is a ‘either or’ situation. You can make a sleeve or a digipak into a gatefold. I did a cheeky search for ‘gatefold jewel case’ but seems like we might be spared that one at least 😅

Personally I always go with ‘gatefold’ over digpak or cardboard/paper sleeve because I think it’s a bit more meaningful when you’re trying to tell releases apart, so to answer your actual practical question - just put in gatefold and don’t worry about sleeve vs digipak!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jesus2099](https://community.metabrainz.org/user_avatar/community.metabrainz.org/jesus2099/32/36_2.png) [@jesus2099](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/jesus2099)
#### Post date: [January 31, 2017, 1:12am UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274/13 "2017-01-31T01:12:25Z")

</div>

> [@ijc](#):
>
> Isn’t it the fold which makes it a gatefold rather than a sleeve?

Exactly, IMO. 🙂

- Digipak is made of cardboard but has a plastic CD tray glued on one of the panes
- Cardboard sleeve is without any folds, no panes, just a pouch for the CD to slide in  
Like the Vynil singles
- Gatefold are cardboard with panes and folds. One of the panes is a pouch for the CD  
Like two fold Vynil albums

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ijc](https://community.metabrainz.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/48db29/32.png) [@ijc](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/ijc)
#### Post date: [January 31, 2017, 7:33am UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/what-is-a-digipak/203274/14 "2017-01-31T07:33:21Z")

</div>

Thanks everyone for the feedback, I’ve changed the release I mentioned as an example and will continue to change other releases as I come across them.
