@doomedtx, as I said in my edit notes, you first removed the feat from title without adding it to artist (move).
Please next times move the feat instead of removing it.
You later on request added it to the artist credits field but it’s kind of confuse this way so it’s better to make a single edit that moves the feat from title to artist credits next time.
Could I get some votes on the following edit. The original information was all entered from online sources that did not show the hidden/unlabeled track 19. I want to add the discid and ISRC’s but cannot for 6 days. https://musicbrainz.org/edit/50212228
It remembers me another edit.
I don’t see why not naming the recording like 100% of its tracks, when a recording has all its track titled the same way.
I would prefer that in the case of 100% track consistency, the recording would follow.
So I go to correct a misassociated artist credit (as well as some style-based fixes) and I get hit with a silent No vote: https://musicbrainz.org/edit/51008788
for some reasons I uploaded a different cd release through picard and only discovered my mistake after I press the enter edit button.
I edited to remove my own edit https://musicbrainz.org/edit/51062069
and if anyone can help me vote on this edit to hasten the removal time.
I have so far uploaded correct cd release to replace this one.
You vote would be highly appreciated.
I need some votes for https://musicbrainz.org/edit/51150188. I am making a new recording because the CD in hand says the track has a different ISRC than the one in the recording already assigned to it. I need the new recording to be created, so I can assign the disc-imported ISRC.
FYI, the ISRC of the original recording was imported from IFPI.org, so I’m not sure of its accuracy.
Would one of you “Spam Ninja’s” look at someones edits @ https://musicbrainz.org/edit/51079851 through 9855? If we run across suspected spam, how should we report it? Sorry about posting here, just didn’t know where else.