Unfortunately, the track listing for the second release did not include the video track even though it is mentioned in an annotation so I can’t proceed until the track listings match. I’ve entered Edit #65421063 to include that track, and it would help if I could get some votes on that.
As an aside, could someone clarify what happens with the release events when releases are merged? Do the events from the selected release only remain, or are the events from the release that is being merged get automatically added to the one that remains?
I’m unsure about this edit, concerning changes in join phrases for conceptual/aesthetic reasons which may be considered subjective/against the sources: https://musicbrainz.org/edit/65632721
I owe you a thank-you for taking your valuable time to investigate.
Although you were also misled into the made-up script battle rather than the hijack of releases, in August.
(The problem was resolved later by edit #65474134 and edit #65474320.)
Platform specific (Audible in this case) intro/outro watermarks glued on tracks. Came up in already closed edit #65501695. Shouldn’t we keep separate recordings for such?
More such merges in queue. Some edits were applied.
The entire opera (14 CDs) uses the English Prelude on the CD jackets, as is seen in photo. Here, the track title deviates from the album cover and the rest of the opera to use the German Vorspiel. Please approve
Problem: Tracks 1, 4 were already linked to recordings having ACs different from those printed. Maybe wrongly merged earlier (no Scholz involved). Anyone eager to sort it out? I would probably make a mess.
Requesting votes on https://musicbrainz.org/edit/66163132
As the edit notes indicate, the added tracks here are not listed on the BC page, but are included in the download as well as on the back cover art.
Editing the medium seemed appropriate here since there’s no loss of information, and I’m not aware of any free-download version that would not include the bonus tracks, as was the case with this album, so creating a separate release didn’t make much sense.
From what I understand, receiving 3(?) Yes votes will cause the edit to be applied immediately in this particular case. Forgive my impatience, but it’d be lovely if I could avoid waiting for a solid week to get the tracks tagged with Picard.
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/66278863
This is yet another case of a box set being scattered as individual releases across multiple release groups, with the earliest edits dating to the pre-NGS era. I wouldn’t normally ask for votes for something like this, but I want to make sure enough eyes see it before anyone impulsively votes No or tries to change anything.
