He’s not removing half the tracks, he’s moving them to a second medium (CD). The album in question was released as a 2 CD set and as a single medium digital download. The editor who first added the release, added it as a single medium, but also added all the CD specific information to the release.
1 Like
Could I please get some votes on my edits here: https://goo.gl/9G1VcD ? These are new Monstercat releases being added by a new editor and I want to make sure there aren’t any more mistakes or missing information before the add edits are accepted. Most of my edits are just fixig the featuring artist in titles and correcting track durations from Monstercat’s Bandcamp, which I chose because it usually also matches the durations on iTunes, Google Play and Spotify. Much appreciated!
Any chance I can get additional votes on edit # 47480144. Trying to remove a digital link to a CD release. Main discussion is on the opposing voters edit, edit #47418285 which I voted no on.
Originally enter as a CD by a band member, later a digital link was added, almost a year later (most likely by same/different band member on another account).
Release added in edit #38565185
Digital link added in edit #44945887
Edit: Sorry had wrong link on the edit I wanted votes on. It’s been corrected.
Hi 
I’m the editor that voted against for various reasons:
First of all, 221bbs is getting ahead of himself for my edit #47418285 is still open and what’s in question (there) is if release was (intended to be) added as CD or in Digital format (see discussion and arguments provided). Until there’s consensus on the format I cannot agree with deleting link (which I initially thought of doing until I realized no proof of CD existed and proof of Digital release abounded).
Secondly this edit is based on a assumption (of his).
To add to context, it’s noteworthy the fact that all their releases are found in digital format with CDs only provided at band homepage.
Finally, it’s not “ethical” practice.
4 posts were split to a new topic: True Care by James Vincent McMorrow iTunes release - [Worldwide] or not
Requesting votes for these edits:
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/47599178
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/47599180
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/47599181
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/47599185
Original editor messed up the release.
https://musicbrainz.org/artist/88b870eb-989f-4e4c-ac52-d956afe2f3aa seems to be a fake artist with release dates in the far future, and no edit notes to suggest that anything about it is real.
I need some votes on these: https://musicbrainz.org/artist/88b870eb-989f-4e4c-ac52-d956afe2f3aa/open_edits
Please keep edit specific notes and discussions to the relevant edits.
1 Like
Can I get somebody take a look at edit # 47558639? It doesn’t look right to me, but I would like to get a second opinion.
I think I need some votes on edit #47873188. I’d like to add more data to this release, but I can’t until the recordings are fixed.
Need votes on https://musicbrainz.org/edit/47873171 to go on further with merging recordings.
Thanks.
Could I get an auto-editor to run the classical replace recording artists script on https://musicbrainz.org/release/db77f67d-9e9b-4623-8ea1-baab173cbe49 ?
Any chance I can get some votes on
Both are about the same issue and involves the same editor. It’s a basic edit of moving edition info to disambiguation comment.
Can someone (preferably an auto-editor) take a look at:
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/48283009
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/48283010
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/48283011
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/48283012
I’ve reported the editor for spam but would like to get the spam links off the website sooner rather than later. Also, it seems removing these relationships is what will cause spam series https://musicbrainz.org/series/c46144f5-7324-473a-bbf3-93d1a77b7308 to go away.
3 Likes
I need some help. I entered https://musicbrainz.org/edit/48366510 but jumped the gun and entered https://musicbrainz.org/edit/48366521 before the former had a chance to pass, and ended up accidentally attaching the Disc ID to the wrong release.
Hi,
requesting to auto-appriove my open edits on this release:
I have crosschecked them with this website: http://www.deccaclassics.com/en/cat/4832158
I also verified a special case with reosarevok CD4 track 12. Decca website mentions WQ30 while it should be WQ41
thx!
I need some votes on this.
A certain editor added an entire release group (alternate versions of the same vinyl, and even a CD reissue) with only one recording for each side, despite the fact the cover art the same editor went on to upload clearly delineates separate tracks (thereby necessitating separate recordings). I can’t clean up the 4 other releases in the release group until this passes, so I’d greatly appreciate some help/extra eyes.
EDIT: The same editor added at least one other release group the same way, this time with a screwed-up join phrase. I entered this edit to kill two birds with one stone; I’m stuck waiting until it passes.
Separating out recordings from two releases (I mistakenly used the same recordings, but they are quite different upon checking/listening to them both):
https://musicbrainz.org/edit/48745039
Thank you!