You didn’t understand, i didn’t say it wasn’t a valid imprint (as a logo or whatever), but label type should not be imprint but reissue production:
For me, the type should rather be set to “reissue production”, according to their discography. But clearly not “imprint”.
The whole discussion is about that: you seem to think only labels with imprint type are/should be valid imprints. But as @reosarevok and few others said a label doesn’t have to have type imprint set to be a valid imprint.