# JSON-LD schema.org structured data broken
**URL:** https://community.metabrainz.org/t/json-ld-schema-org-structured-data-broken/294024
**Category:** MusicBrainz
**Tags:** schema, structured-data, json-ld
**Created:** [June 28, 2017, 9:58am UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/json-ld-schema-org-structured-data-broken/294024 "2017-06-28T09:58:28Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@iantresman](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/iantresman)
#### Post date: [June 28, 2017, 9:58am UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/json-ld-schema-org-structured-data-broken/294024/1 "2017-06-28T09:58:28Z")
If I use Google’s [Structured Data Testing tool](https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool/u/0/), to check a MusicBrainz artist, it reports an error “Missing ‘}’ or object member name” suggesting that the JSON-LD is not structured properly, and Google and MusicBrainz are probably not getting any value from the information.
I believe that Google implemented the JSON-LD [schema.org](http://schema.org) for MusicBrainz, but they might not be aware of the issue, and I have no idea who the contact might be. It would also be useful if Google supported JSON-LD [schema.org](http://schema.org):
1. For [Events](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/events)
2. The [enhanced Music schema.org](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/music), in particular the new “potentialAction: ListenAction,” which links audio recordings to the data
---
### Author:  [@reosarevok](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/reosarevok)
#### Post date: [June 28, 2017, 11:37am UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/json-ld-schema-org-structured-data-broken/294024/2 "2017-06-28T11:37:11Z")
Created a ticket for the bug: [MBS-9392](https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/MBS-9392)