see this and other external links on the mbz page
Self release, imo.
At least until the ālabelā releases other artists, or gets its own website (a different one to the artists one), or something like that.
Yeah, I think Iāve seen a few of these āvanity catalog numbersā lately too. Itās a shame that thereās no place to store them (except annotations), but I just go with ā[no label]ā or leave the release label unset in this case too.
Oh fun, I added that release
Yeah, since artists can specify more or less anything in that field on digital storefronts, Iām cautious when it matches the musicianās name. If thereās a label page for it on Discogs or the like, Iāll add it, but otherwise I leave it blank.
ok thanks for the info guys!
Iām organizing my music collection rn and this is the first release Iāve came across with the label field blank, so it jumped out to me as an outlier. but if a blank label field is a valid thing that will come up in other releases as well then I donāt really mind
I have set it to [no label], which is the recommended way to credit self-releases and the like.
So you will no longer have that annoying gap in your player!
[no label] is so handy - otherwise youāre left wondering āis this a self-release, or is MB missing infoā