# How to handle "extra releases" linked to a specific release? 

**URL:** <https://community.metabrainz.org/t/how-to-handle-extra-releases-linked-to-a-specific-release/813922>\
**Category:** Style\
**Tags:** release, style\
**Created:** [December 22, 2025, 12:35pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/how-to-handle-extra-releases-linked-to-a-specific-release/813922 "2025-12-22T12:35:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![yindesu](https://community.metabrainz.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/y/b77776/32.png) [@yindesu](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/yindesu)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2025, 9:43pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/how-to-handle-extra-releases-linked-to-a-specific-release/813922/8 "2025-12-24T21:43:48Z")

</div>

> [@jesus2099](#):
>
> You would have several editions of main disc: regular edition without extra CD, limited time edition with extra CD 1, limited time edition with extra CD 2…

The majority consensus in [Bonus Disc](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/bonus-disc/658056) (which I already mentioned) was _not_ to do that for this kind of standard JP release practice.

The hypothetical application of your view, as presented in [Bonus Disc - #28 by yakumo0209](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/bonus-disc/658056/28), flagrantly violates artist intent.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/how-to-handle-extra-releases-linked-to-a-specific-release/813922)._
