# Help: Confusing mess of Toto IV releases

**URL:** https://community.metabrainz.org/t/help-confusing-mess-of-toto-iv-releases/747614
**Category:** MusicBrainz
**Tags:** musicbrainz
**Created:** [March 6, 2025, 5:53pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/help-confusing-mess-of-toto-iv-releases/747614 "2025-03-06T17:53:47Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![biocv](https://community.metabrainz.org/user_avatar/community.metabrainz.org/biocv/32/25412_2.png) [@biocv](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/biocv)
#### Post date: [March 9, 2025, 3:32pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/help-confusing-mess-of-toto-iv-releases/747614/14 "2025-03-09T15:32:52Z")

</div>

Why not? You can use the rules of thumb outlined below to guide you.

> [@Rules of thumb for the clean-up of releases with multiple DiscIDs](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/rules-of-thumb-for-the-clean-up-of-releases-with-multiple-discids/492301):
>
> Some releases in MB are burdened with an excessive number of attached DiscIDs, e.g.: As I understand it, large collections of DiscIDs are partly the legacy of the old database schema and partly the accumulation of DiscIDs attached to a non-matching edition. It is very well possible DiscIDs are shared among different releases. However, it should be less common to see any single release host multiple DiscIDs. Exceptions to this rule exist, e.g. discs containing data tracks can have two valid Di…

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/help-confusing-mess-of-toto-iv-releases/747614)._
