# Concerning the new "is about" relation

**URL:** https://community.metabrainz.org/t/concerning-the-new-is-about-relation/497088
**Category:** BookBrainz
**Created:** [September 30, 2020, 9:27am UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/concerning-the-new-is-about-relation/497088 "2020-09-30T09:27:38Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 16

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![reosarevok](https://community.metabrainz.org/user_avatar/community.metabrainz.org/reosarevok/32/69228_2.png) [@reosarevok](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/reosarevok)
#### Post date: [November 5, 2020, 1:56pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/concerning-the-new-is-about-relation/497088/16 "2020-11-05T13:56:08Z")

</div>

I’d possibly even argue someone who never wrote anything, but about whom _several_ biographies have been written might be worth considering for addition. Would be neat to have a way to see “these are all the biographies of historical figure X”. I guess most historical figures did write some stuff, but 🙂

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/concerning-the-new-is-about-relation/497088)._