# Classical Extras 2.0 **URL:** https://community.metabrainz.org/t/classical-extras-2-0/394627 **Category:** MusicBrainz Picard **Tags:** classical, picard-plugins-fixme, picard **Created:** [August 19, 2018, 10:05am UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/classical-extras-2-0/394627 "2018-08-19T10:05:46Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 49
### Author: ![MetaTunes](https://community.metabrainz.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/ea5d25/32.png) [@MetaTunes](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/MetaTunes) #### Post date: [June 25, 2019, 8:08am UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/classical-extras-2-0/394627/49 "2019-06-25T08:08:36Z")
I think those edits are correct, so I’ve voted for them. However, it doesn’t look like you added the aliases and then used @loujin’s [browser script](https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/20766-musicbrainz-edit-replace-recording-artists-from-a-release-page) as I suggested. That script makes edits like this a breeze (although you still need to wait for the voting before they take effect). Let’s see how it works through. Re the general point of editing classical releases, I agree it can be a bit time consuming sometimes, but there are a lot of short cuts (see [The Classical Editor’s Toolbox](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/the-classical-editor-toolbox/295817)) and there are people on this forum who can help. If you have a lot of releases to tag then you may choose to accept less than top-quality metadata first time around, then fix it later when you get time and where the pay-off is worth the effort. Re-submitting MusicBrainz-tagged releases to Picard is easy and, if you saved the Classical Extras tagging options (in the advanced tab) the first time around, it will apply the same options next time, even if you changed them in the panels. --- _[View the full topic](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/classical-extras-2-0/394627)._