# Band Leaders and their orchestras

**URL:** https://community.metabrainz.org/t/band-leaders-and-their-orchestras/159077
**Category:** Style
**Tags:** style
**Created:** [October 21, 2016, 5:00pm UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/band-leaders-and-their-orchestras/159077 "2016-10-21T17:00:43Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SaiyanRiku](https://community.metabrainz.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/e79b87/32.png) [@SaiyanRiku](https://community.metabrainz.org/u/SaiyanRiku)
#### Post date: [October 25, 2016, 11:46am UTC](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/band-leaders-and-their-orchestras/159077/8 "2016-10-25T11:46:38Z")

</div>

For me i think that in your example:

- “Paul Mauriat & His Orchestra” should be a single group artist related to main artist “Paul Mauriat”.
- “Le Grand Orchestre de Paul Mauriat” can be an aliases of “Paul Mauriat & His Orchestra” or a separated group depending of the purpose of this name.

I think it’s not different from any group of music. “Queen” might have been called “Freddie Mercury and his band”, for me this is the same.

Nevertheless, I just think that musicbrainz should show by default in the discography of an artist all entries related to the groups he is marked as members.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.metabrainz.org/t/band-leaders-and-their-orchestras/159077)._
